Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
13-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

13-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003180 50.852909)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003066 50.852897,-1.003072 50.852919,-1.003087 50.852939,-1.003112 50.852955,-1.003144 50.852966,-1.003179 50.852969,-1.003214 50.852966,-1.003246 50.852956,-1.003271 50.852941,-1.003288 50.852921,-1.003294 50.852898,-1.003289 50.852876,-1.003273 50.852856,-1.003248 50.852840,-1.003217 50.852829,-1.003182 50.852826,-1.003146 50.852829,-1.003115 50.852839,-1.003089 50.852854,-1.003072 50.852874,-1.003066 50.852897)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL